0.75 Carat Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm) vs. 0.75 Carat Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm)
Diamond comparison
Actual size is set for screen
Change
sample image
|
vs. |
sample image
|
|||||||||
| 0.75 ct Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm) | 0.75 ct Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm) |
Cutting style
Modified brilliant
Modified brilliant
Weight
0.75 ct
0.75 ct
Measurements
7.83×7.83×3.13 mm
5.51×5.51×3.97 mm
L/W ratio
1
1
Face-up size
Inadequate
Inadequate
This diamond is a SPREAD CUT!
This diamond is a SPREAD CUT!
Actual diamond size
Before purchasing a diamond, one should make sure it looks its weight.
It's important to understand that
carat weight does not equal face-up size.
Two diamonds of exactly the same weight (and shape) can vary quite considerably in face-up size. This depends on the proportions of the cut (e.g., deep cuts will face up smaller).
Here you can see the actual sizes of 0.75ct Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm) and 0.75ct Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm) as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these stones would look on your finger. To choose different diamonds or to change diamond parameters click here.
Compare prices and availability from recommended online vendors:
Two diamonds of exactly the same weight (and shape) can vary quite considerably in face-up size. This depends on the proportions of the cut (e.g., deep cuts will face up smaller).
Here you can see the actual sizes of 0.75ct Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm) and 0.75ct Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm) as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these stones would look on your finger. To choose different diamonds or to change diamond parameters click here.
Compare prices and availability from recommended online vendors:
Settings
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Actual size is set for screen
Change
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the diamond
when viewed from the top (as set in a ring).
It tells you how big the diamond is at the girdle plane. It's important for a diamond to have sufficient face-up size for its carat weight.
It tells you how big the diamond is at the girdle plane. It's important for a diamond to have sufficient face-up size for its carat weight.
| 0.75ct Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm) | |
| 0.75ct Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm) | |
| Difference: 7.65mm² (25%) |
0.75 carat Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm) has approx. 25% more top surface area than 0.75 carat Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm).
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.
Quick Buying Guide
0.75ct Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm)
0.75ct Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm)
Min. clarity
SI or better
VS2, SI1 or better
Min. color (platinum solitaire)
H+
I+
Depth percentage
32 - 48%
64 - 75%
Table percentage
50 - 70%
60 - 75%
Length-to-width ratio
1.00 - 1.10
1.00 - 1.05
Min. polish/symmetry
Good or better
Good or better
Additional Info
0.75ct Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm)
0.75ct Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm)
Face-up size
Too large for 0.75 carat Trillion
Too large for 0.75 carat Princess
Facets
Between 31 - 50
usually between 50 - 58
Length
7.83 mm
5.51 mm
Width
7.83 mm
5.51 mm
Depth
3.13 mm
3.97 mm
Gram weight
0.15 g (0.0053 ounces)
0.15 g (0.0053 ounces)
Points
75 pts
75 pts
Volume
42.61 mm³
42.61 mm³
Compare diamonds
Choose diamonds to compare:
Popular comparisons:
- 0.7ct Trillion (6.45x6.42x2.7) vs. 0.54ct Trillion (6.07x6.43x2.25)
- 0.73ct Trillion (6.47x7.06x3.03) vs. 0.54ct Trillion (6.07x6.43x2.25)
- 0.79ct Trillion (7.15x7.15x2.86) vs. 0.79ct Round (6.01x6.01x3.62)
- 0.68ct Trillion (6.39x7.55x2.87) vs. 0.51ct Radiant (3.95x5.03x2.9)
- 0.74ct Trillion (6.11x7.04x2.96) vs. 1.15ct Trillion (7.15x7.51x3.23)
- 0.71ct Trillion (6.9x6.9x2.76) vs. 1.55ct Trillion (8.9x8.9x3.5)
- 0.7ct Trillion (6.45x6.42x2.7) vs. 0.73ct Trillion (6.47x7.06x3.03)
- 0.8ct Trillion (7.18x7.18x2.87) vs. 0.55ct Trillion (6x6x2.9)
- 0.75ct Trillion (7.03x7.03x2.81) vs. 0.8ct Marquise (10.49x4.77x2.34)
More comparisons:
- 0.68ct Trillion (6.39x7.55x2.87) vs. 0.64ct Round (5.68x5.68x3.26)
- 0.68ct Trillion (6.39x7.55x2.87) vs. 2.27ct Cushion (6.92x7.73x4.71)
- 0.82ct Trillion (6.77x7.62x3.21) vs. 1.06ct Trillion (7.75x7.17x3.22)
- 0.77ct Trillion (7.13x8.12x2.60) vs. 0.9ct Trillion (7.13x8.12x3.00)
- 0.8ct Trillion (6.5x6.5x2.87) vs. 3ct Radiant (9.5x8.5x5.33)
- 0.75ct Trillion (7.03x7.03x2.81) vs. 0.85ct Round (6x6x3.6)
- 0.7ct Trillion (6.15x6.5x4) vs. 0.7ct Round (6.15x6.5x4)
- 0.74ct Trillion (7.04x6.11x2.96) vs. 1.15ct Trillion (7.51x7.15x3.23)
- 0.7ct Trillion (6.45x6.42x2.7) vs. 0.54ct Trillion (6.07x6.43x3.03)
- 0.75ct Trillion (7.03x7.03x2.81) vs. 0.69ct Marquise (10.49x4.77x2.34)
Depth percentage for 0.75 carat Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm)
Depth percentage of Trillion cut is the ratio of the total depth (measured from table to culet)
to its width. The total depth percentage of this diamond
is 40%, which is OK.
(Recommended depth percentage for Trillions is between 32% and
48%)
Depth percentage for trillions is calculated with the following formula:
Depth percentage for trillions is calculated with the following formula:
Depth % = (total depth ÷ width) × 100
0.75 carat
Trillion
(7.83×7.83×3.13mm) depth %:
Total depth: 3.13 mm
Width = 7.83 mm
Width = 7.83 mm
Depth % = (3.13 ÷ 7.83 ) × 100 = 40%
Depth percentage for 0.75 carat Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm)
Depth percentage of Princess cut is the ratio of the total depth (measured from table to culet)
to its width. The total depth percentage of this diamond
is 72.1%, which is OK.
(Recommended depth percentage for Princesses is between 64% and
75%)
Depth percentage for princesses is calculated with the following formula:
Depth percentage for princesses is calculated with the following formula:
Depth % = (total depth ÷ width) × 100
0.75 carat
Princess
(5.51×5.51×3.97mm) depth %:
Total depth: 3.97 mm
Width = 5.51 mm
Width = 5.51 mm
Depth % = (3.97 ÷ 5.51 ) × 100 = 72.1%
About Depth Percentage
Depth percentage is one of the most important measurements as it plays a critical role in diamond's
appearance. If a diamond is cut too deep or too shallow, light leaks out, making
the stone less brilliant and fiery. Deep cuts also add hidden weight.
Diamonds that fall out of recommended depth range are generally less desirable and usually best to be avoided.
Diamonds that fall out of recommended depth range are generally less desirable and usually best to be avoided.
Face-up size evaluation for 0.75 carat Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm)
The face-up size of this 0.75 carat Trillion
(7.83×7.83×3.13mm) is out of normal range for
0.75ct diamonds of this shape. Compared to 0.75
carat Trillion reference diamond, this diamond appears too big
when viewed from the top. You might think that's a good thing, however, it's not.
This is a so called spread cut.
A spread cut is a diamond that is cut to maximize spread. It looks larger than a well-cut 0.75ct Trillion when viewed from the top, however, this is not a good thing. Spread cuts are typically too shallow, which allows light to leak out of the stone instead of being properly returned back to the viewer's eye.
Spread cuts usually look lifeless and flat, and can sometimes exhibit a fish-eye effect. They may also come with an extremely thin girdle which can easily chip.
A spread cut is a diamond that is cut to maximize spread. It looks larger than a well-cut 0.75ct Trillion when viewed from the top, however, this is not a good thing. Spread cuts are typically too shallow, which allows light to leak out of the stone instead of being properly returned back to the viewer's eye.
Spread cuts usually look lifeless and flat, and can sometimes exhibit a fish-eye effect. They may also come with an extremely thin girdle which can easily chip.
The bottom line:
Spread cuts generally lack the brilliance and perfection that is
expected of a beautiful diamond. Don't be fooled into thinking that you're
getting a larger diamond for the money. This could be a rather flat, boring stone.
0.75 carat Trillion reference diamond
Since there are no specific ideal proportions defined for Trillion cuts,
an estimation formula is used to calculate the Trillion reference diamond.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Note: Trillion diamonds with face-up area of within 13% lower
and 16% higher than reference Trillion diamond area
are considered to be of adequate face-up size.
* Estimated Face-up area: Face-up area of Trillion cuts
is only an estimation (±9%). Due to uniqueness of each stone,
it's impossible to accurately calculate face-up area given only a diamond's measurements.
To learn more about diamond size evaluation, click here.
Face-up size evaluation for 0.75 carat Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm)
The face-up size of this 0.75 carat Princess
(5.51×5.51×3.97mm) is out of normal range for
0.75ct diamonds of this shape. Compared to 0.75
carat Princess reference diamond, this diamond appears too big
when viewed from the top. You might think that's a good thing, however, it's not.
This is a so called spread cut.
A spread cut is a diamond that is cut to maximize spread. It looks larger than a well-cut 0.75ct Princess when viewed from the top, however, this is not a good thing. Spread cuts are typically too shallow, which allows light to leak out of the stone instead of being properly returned back to the viewer's eye.
Spread cuts usually look lifeless and flat, and can sometimes exhibit a fish-eye effect. They may also come with an extremely thin girdle which can easily chip.
A spread cut is a diamond that is cut to maximize spread. It looks larger than a well-cut 0.75ct Princess when viewed from the top, however, this is not a good thing. Spread cuts are typically too shallow, which allows light to leak out of the stone instead of being properly returned back to the viewer's eye.
Spread cuts usually look lifeless and flat, and can sometimes exhibit a fish-eye effect. They may also come with an extremely thin girdle which can easily chip.
The bottom line:
Spread cuts generally lack the brilliance and perfection that is
expected of a beautiful diamond. Don't be fooled into thinking that you're
getting a larger diamond for the money. This could be a rather flat, boring stone.
0.75 carat Princess reference diamond
Since there are no specific ideal proportions defined for Princess cuts,
an estimation formula is used to calculate the Princess reference diamond.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Note: Princess diamonds with face-up area of within 8% lower
and 12% higher than reference Princess diamond area
are considered to be of adequate face-up size.
To learn more about diamond size evaluation, click here.
Face-up Area per Carat
Face-up area per carat is calculated by dividing face-up area of the diamond with
its carat weight. It tells you how many square millimeters of the top surface area
a diamond is showing or would show for 1 carat weight. This can be useful when comparing stones
of similar weights as it tells you how much spread per carat you will get.
Note: Face-up size does not linearly grow with carat weight,
which means the heavier the stone, the smaller its face-up area per carat (e.g., 1ct stone will have
higher face-up area per carat than 2ct stone).
Face-up area per carat
for 0.75ct Trillion (7.83×7.83×3.13mm):
Top surface area = 38.01 mm²
Weight = 0.75ct
Face-up area per carat = 38.01 ÷ 0.75 = 50.68mm²/ct
Weight = 0.75ct
Face-up area per carat = 38.01 ÷ 0.75 = 50.68mm²/ct
Face-up area per carat
for 0.75ct Princess (5.51×5.51×3.97mm):
Top surface area = 30.36 mm²
Weight = 0.75ct
Face-up area per carat = 30.36 ÷ 0.75 = 40.48mm²/ct
Weight = 0.75ct
Face-up area per carat = 30.36 ÷ 0.75 = 40.48mm²/ct
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a diamond, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a diamond, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.