7.54ct Cushion (11×10×6.2) vs 6ct Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62)

Diamond size comparison

Actual size is set for screen Change
Actual size of 7.54ct Cushion diamond
Actual size
sample image
vs.
Actual size of 6ct Emerald diamond
Actual size
sample image
7.54 ct Cushion (11×10×6.2mm) 6 ct Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm)
Cutting style
(modified) brilliant
Step cut
Weight
7.54 ct
6 ct
Measurements
11×10×6.2 mm
13.96×9.35×5.62 mm
Total depth
62% OK
60.1% OK
L/W ratio
1.1
1.49
Face-up size
Inadequate
Inadequate
 
This diamond does NOT look its weight!
This diamond is a SPREAD CUT!
Actual diamond size
Actual diamond size
Before purchasing a diamond, one should make sure it looks its weight. It's important to understand that carat weight does not equal face-up size.

Two diamonds of exactly the same weight (and shape) can vary quite considerably in face-up size. This depends on the proportions of the cut (e.g., deep cuts will face up smaller).

Here you can see the actual sizes of 7.54ct Cushion (11×10×6.2mm) and 6ct Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm) as they would appear on a ring and finger.

Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these stones would look on your finger. To choose different diamonds or to change diamond parameters click here.
Settings
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
Left finger image
Ring on a left finger
7.54ct Cushion on a left ring
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
6ct Emerald on a right ring
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
7.54ct Cushion side view Side view of ring
vs
6ct Emerald side view Side view of ring
Actual size is set for screen Change
Face-up area
99 mm²  (±5%)
124 mm²  (±4%)
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the diamond when viewed from the top (as set in a ring).

It tells you how big the diamond is at the girdle plane. It's important for a diamond to have sufficient face-up size for its carat weight.
Face-up size outline
Face-up size outline
7.54ct Cushion (11×10×6.2mm)
6ct Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm)
Difference: 25mm² (25%)
6 carat Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm) has approx. 25% more face-up area than 7.54 carat Cushion (11×10×6.2mm).
Face-up area per carat
13.13 mm²/ct
20.67 mm²/ct
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.


Quick Buying Guide

Diamond prices vary greatly as they depend on the combination of unique characteristics (4Cs - Cut, Color, Clarity, and Carat). For best value, it's important to choose the combination that will reduce the price without having a negative impact on appearance.

Each shape has its own recommended balance of qualities that will give you the most bang for your buck. Below is a quick buying guide to give you an idea, but for more detailed explanation, please see the complete buying guides for the respective diamonds (links below).
7.54ct Cushion (11×10×6.2mm)
6ct Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm)
Price (best value)
Min. clarity
SI1 or better
VS or better
Min. color (platinum setting)
H+
H+
Min. color (yellow gold setting)
J+
I+
Depth percentage
59 - 70%
60 - 69%
Table percentage
56 - 70%
58 - 69%
Length-to-width ratio
1.00 - 1.35
1.25 - 1.65
Min. polish/symmetry
Good or better
Good or better
 Detailed buying guide

Additional Info

7.54ct Cushion (11×10×6.2mm)
6ct Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm)
Face-up size
Too small for 7.54 carat Cushion
Too large for 6 carat Emerald
Facets
usually 58
usually 58
Length
11 mm
13.96 mm
Width
10 mm
9.35 mm
Depth
6.2 mm
5.62 mm
Gram weight
1.51 g (0.0532 ounces)
1.2 g (0.0423 ounces)
Points
754 pts
600 pts
Volume
428.41 mm³
340.91 mm³


Compare diamonds

Choose diamonds to compare:
 
× ×
carat vs. length* width* depth*
× ×
 
* Optional

Depth percentage for 7.54 carat Cushion (11×10×6.2mm)

Depth percentage of Cushion cut is the ratio of the total depth (measured from table to culet) to its width. The total depth percentage of this diamond is 62%, which is OK. (Recommended depth percentage for Cushions is between 59% and 70%)

Depth percentage for cushions is calculated with the following formula:
Depth % = (total depth ÷ width) × 100

7.54 carat Cushion (11×10×6.2mm) depth %:
Total depth: 6.2 mm
Width = 10 mm
Depth % = (6.2 ÷ 10 ) × 100 = 62%

Depth percentage for 6 carat Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm)

Depth percentage of Emerald cut is the ratio of the total depth (measured from table to culet) to its width. The total depth percentage of this diamond is 60.1%, which is OK. (Recommended depth percentage for Emeralds is between 60% and 69%)

Depth percentage for emeralds is calculated with the following formula:
Depth % = (total depth ÷ width) × 100

6 carat Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm) depth %:
Total depth: 5.62 mm
Width = 9.35 mm
Depth % = (5.62 ÷ 9.35 ) × 100 = 60.1%

About Depth Percentage
Depth percentage is one of the most important measurements as it plays a critical role in diamond's appearance. If a diamond is cut too deep or too shallow, light leaks out, making the stone less brilliant and fiery. Deep cuts also add hidden weight.

Diamonds that fall out of recommended depth range are generally less desirable and usually best to be avoided.


Face-up size evaluation for 7.54 carat Cushion (11×10×6.2mm)

The face-up size of this 7.54 carat Cushion (11×10×6.2mm) is out of normal range for 7.54ct diamonds of this shape. Compared to 7.54 carat Cushion reference diamond, this diamond appears too small when viewed from the top, which makes it a chubby.

A chubby is a diamond with hidden extra weight that looks smaller than it should when viewed from the top. Hidden weight is typically a result of a poor cut usually linked to oversized girdle, deeper pavilion, and/or steeper crown.

In order to maximize profits, diamond cutters tend to retain as much weight from the rough as possible. This practice, however, can have detrimental effects on the stone's face-up size and its optical qualities. Poorly proportioned stones look duller and sparkle less than well cut stones. Chubby stones also look smaller.

The bottom line: One should never sacrifice beauty for weight. You probably don't want to pay for extra weight that doesn't add anything to the beauty. You want a stone that looks its weight. This 7.54ct Cushion doesn't - from above, its size is comparable to a well cut 5.83ct Cushion.

7.54 carat Cushion reference diamond
Since there are no specific ideal proportions defined for Cushion cuts, an estimation formula is used to calculate the Cushion reference diamond.
Parameters:
Weight: 7.54ct
Depth: 64%
L/W ratio: 1
 
Calculated values:
Length: 11.42 mm
Width: 11.42 mm
Depth: 7.31 mm
*Est. face-up area: 117.37 mm²
Note: Cushion diamonds with face-up area of within 9% lower and 12% higher than reference Cushion diamond area are considered to be of adequate face-up size.
* Estimated Face-up area: Face-up area of Cushion cuts is only an estimation (±5%). Due to uniqueness of each stone, it's impossible to accurately calculate face-up area given only a diamond's measurements.
To learn more about diamond size evaluation, click here.


Face-up size evaluation for 6 carat Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm)

The face-up size of this 6 carat Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm) is out of normal range for 6ct diamonds of this shape. Compared to 6 carat Emerald reference diamond, this diamond appears too big when viewed from the top. You might think that's a good thing, however, it's not. This is a so called spread cut.

A spread cut is a diamond that is cut to maximize spread instead of optimal light performance. If compared from above, it would look larger than a well cut 6ct Emerald. This is not a good thing. Spread cuts are typically too shallow, which allows light to leak out of the stone resulting in less light being reflected back to the viewer's eye.

Spread cuts usually look lifeless and flat, and can sometimes exhibit a fish-eye effect. They may also come with an extremely thin girdle which can easily chip.

The bottom line: Spread cuts generally lack the brilliance and perfection that is expected of a beautiful diamond. Don't be fooled into thinking that you're getting a larger diamond for the money. This could be a rather flat, boring stone.

6 carat Emerald reference diamond
Since there are no specific ideal proportions defined for Emerald cuts, an estimation formula is used to calculate the Emerald reference diamond.
Parameters:
Weight: 6ct
Depth: 65%
L/W ratio: 1.35
 
Calculated values:
Length: 12.03 mm
Width: 8.91 mm
Depth: 5.79 mm
*Est. face-up area: 101.83 mm²
Note: Emerald diamonds with face-up area of within 9% lower and 12% higher than reference Emerald diamond area are considered to be of adequate face-up size.
* Estimated Face-up area: Face-up area of Emerald cuts is only an estimation (±4%). Due to uniqueness of each stone, it's impossible to accurately calculate face-up area given only a diamond's measurements.
To learn more about diamond size evaluation, click here.


Face-up Area per Carat

Face-up area per carat is calculated by dividing face-up area of the diamond with its carat weight. It tells you how many square millimeters of the top surface area a diamond is showing or would show for 1 carat weight. This can be useful when comparing stones of similar weights as it tells you how much spread per carat you will get.

Note: Face-up size does not linearly grow with carat weight, which means the heavier the stone, the smaller its face-up area per carat (e.g., 1ct stone will have higher face-up area per carat than 2ct stone).

Face-up area per carat for 7.54ct Cushion (11×10×6.2mm):
Top surface area = 99 mm²
Weight = 7.54ct

Face-up area per carat = 99 ÷ 7.54 = 13.13mm²/ct

Face-up area per carat for 6ct Emerald (13.96×9.35×5.62mm):
Top surface area = 124 mm²
Weight = 6ct

Face-up area per carat = 124 ÷ 6 = 20.67mm²/ct

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is  inches



Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a diamond, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.