8.32ct Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67) vs 4.27ct Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08)
Diamond size comparison
Actual size is set for screen
Change
sample image
|
vs. |
sample image
|
|||||||||
| 8.32 ct Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67mm) | 4.27 ct Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08mm) |
Cutting style
Step cut
Mixed
Weight
8.32 ct
4.27 ct
Measurements
11.8×13.7×7.67 mm
9.5×10.5×6.08 mm
L/W ratio
1.16
1.11
Face-up size
Inadequate
Borderline
This diamond is a SPREAD CUT!
This diamond is borderline SPREAD CUT!
Actual diamond size
Before purchasing a diamond, one should make sure it looks its weight.
It's important to understand that
carat weight does not equal face-up size.
Two diamonds of exactly the same weight (and shape) can vary quite considerably in face-up size. This depends on the proportions of the cut (e.g., deep cuts will face up smaller).
Here you can see the actual sizes of 8.32ct Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67mm) and 4.27ct Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08mm) as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these stones would look on your finger. To choose different diamonds or to change diamond parameters click here.
Two diamonds of exactly the same weight (and shape) can vary quite considerably in face-up size. This depends on the proportions of the cut (e.g., deep cuts will face up smaller).
Here you can see the actual sizes of 8.32ct Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67mm) and 4.27ct Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08mm) as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these stones would look on your finger. To choose different diamonds or to change diamond parameters click here.
Settings
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Actual size is set for screen
Change
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the diamond
when viewed from the top (as set in a ring).
It tells you how big the diamond is at the girdle plane. It's important for a diamond to have sufficient face-up size for its carat weight.
It tells you how big the diamond is at the girdle plane. It's important for a diamond to have sufficient face-up size for its carat weight.
| 8.32ct Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67mm) | |
| 4.27ct Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08mm) | |
| Difference: 58.82mm² (62%) |
8.32 carat Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67mm) has approx. 62% more face-up area than 4.27 carat Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08mm).
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.
Quick Buying Guide
Diamond prices vary greatly as they depend on the combination of unique characteristics (4Cs - Cut, Color, Clarity, and Carat). For best value, it's important to choose the combination that will reduce the price without having a negative impact on appearance.
Each shape has its own recommended balance of qualities that will give you the most bang for your buck. Below is a quick buying guide to give you an idea, but for more detailed explanation, please see the complete buying guides for the respective diamonds (links below).
Each shape has its own recommended balance of qualities that will give you the most bang for your buck. Below is a quick buying guide to give you an idea, but for more detailed explanation, please see the complete buying guides for the respective diamonds (links below).
8.32ct Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67mm)
4.27ct Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08mm)
Min. clarity
VS or better
SI or better
Min. color (platinum setting)
H+
H+
Min. color (yellow gold setting)
I+
J+
Depth percentage
60 - 69%
59 - 70%
Table percentage
58 - 69%
58 - 70%
Length-to-width ratio
1.25 - 1.65
1.00 - 1.35
Min. polish/symmetry
Good or better
Good or better
Additional Info
8.32ct Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67mm)
4.27ct Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08mm)
Face-up size
Too large for 8.32 carat Emerald
A bit large for 4.27 carat Radiant
Facets
usually 58
usually between 62 - 70
Length
11.8 mm
9.5 mm
Width
13.7 mm
10.5 mm
Depth
7.67 mm
6.08 mm
Gram weight
1.66 g (0.0587 ounces)
0.85 g (0.0301 ounces)
Points
832 pts
427 pts
Volume
472.73 mm³
242.61 mm³
Compare diamonds
Choose diamonds to compare:
Popular comparisons:
- 8.32ct Emerald (11.8x13.7x7.67) vs. 7.58ct Emerald (10.9x12.9x7.09)
- 8.23ct Emerald (13.23x9.5x5.9) vs. 10ct Emerald (15x10.1x6.57)
- 8.26ct Emerald (14.18x9.55x6.1) vs. 6.08ct Pear (15.85x10.11x6.4)
- 8.25ct Emerald (15.22x9.32x6.27) vs. 5.95ct Emerald (12.29x9.49x5.81)
- 8.25ct Emerald (13.5x10x6.5) vs. 1ct Round (6.5x6.5x3.92)
- 8.25ct Emerald (13.5x10x6.5) vs. 10ct Emerald (14.39x10.66x6.93)
- 8.24ct Emerald (14.5x11.5x7.48) vs. 4ct Oval (12x10x6.1)
- 8.23ct Emerald (13.32x9.5x6.18) vs. 9.61ct Emerald (14.12x10.02x6.51)
- 8.39ct Emerald (13.58x10.06x6.54) vs. 1ct Round (6.5x6.5x3.92)
Depth percentage for 8.32 carat Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67mm)
Depth percentage of Emerald cut is the ratio of the total depth (measured from table to culet)
to its width. The total depth percentage of this diamond
is 65%, which is OK.
(Recommended depth percentage for Emeralds is between 60% and
69%)
Depth percentage for emeralds is calculated with the following formula:
Depth percentage for emeralds is calculated with the following formula:
Depth % = (total depth ÷ width) × 100
8.32 carat
Emerald
(11.8×13.7×7.67mm) depth %:
Total depth: 7.67 mm
Width = 13.7 mm
Width = 13.7 mm
Depth % = (7.67 ÷ 13.7 ) × 100 = 65%
Depth percentage for 4.27 carat Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08mm)
Depth percentage of Radiant cut is the ratio of the total depth (measured from table to culet)
to its width. The total depth percentage of this diamond
is 64%, which is OK.
(Recommended depth percentage for Radiants is between 59% and
70%)
Depth percentage for radiants is calculated with the following formula:
Depth percentage for radiants is calculated with the following formula:
Depth % = (total depth ÷ width) × 100
4.27 carat
Radiant
(9.5×10.5×6.08mm) depth %:
Total depth: 6.08 mm
Width = 10.5 mm
Width = 10.5 mm
Depth % = (6.08 ÷ 10.5 ) × 100 = 64%
About Depth Percentage
Depth percentage is one of the most important measurements as it plays a critical role in diamond's
appearance. If a diamond is cut too deep or too shallow, light leaks out, making
the stone less brilliant and fiery. Deep cuts also add hidden weight.
Diamonds that fall out of recommended depth range are generally less desirable and usually best to be avoided.
Diamonds that fall out of recommended depth range are generally less desirable and usually best to be avoided.
Face-up size evaluation for 8.32 carat Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67mm)
The face-up size of this 8.32 carat Emerald
(11.8×13.7×7.67mm) is out of normal range for
8.32ct diamonds of this shape. Compared to 8.32
carat Emerald reference diamond, this diamond appears too big
when viewed from the top. You might think that's a good thing, however, it's not.
This is a so called spread cut.
A spread cut is a diamond that is cut to maximize spread instead of optimal light performance. If compared from above, it would look larger than a well cut 8.32ct Emerald. This is not a good thing. Spread cuts are typically too shallow, which allows light to leak out of the stone resulting in less light being reflected back to the viewer's eye.
Spread cuts usually look lifeless and flat, and can sometimes exhibit a fish-eye effect. They may also come with an extremely thin girdle which can easily chip.
A spread cut is a diamond that is cut to maximize spread instead of optimal light performance. If compared from above, it would look larger than a well cut 8.32ct Emerald. This is not a good thing. Spread cuts are typically too shallow, which allows light to leak out of the stone resulting in less light being reflected back to the viewer's eye.
Spread cuts usually look lifeless and flat, and can sometimes exhibit a fish-eye effect. They may also come with an extremely thin girdle which can easily chip.
The bottom line:
Spread cuts generally lack the brilliance and perfection that is
expected of a beautiful diamond. Don't be fooled into thinking that you're
getting a larger diamond for the money. This could be a rather flat, boring stone.
8.32 carat Emerald reference diamond
Since there are no specific ideal proportions defined for Emerald cuts,
an estimation formula is used to calculate the Emerald reference diamond.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Note: Emerald diamonds with face-up area of within 9% lower
and 12% higher than reference Emerald diamond area
are considered to be of adequate face-up size.
* Estimated Face-up area: Face-up area of Emerald cuts
is only an estimation (±4%). Due to uniqueness of each stone,
it's impossible to accurately calculate face-up area given only a diamond's measurements.
To learn more about diamond size evaluation, click here.
Face-up size evaluation for 4.27 carat Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08mm)
The face-up size of this 4.27 carat Radiant
(9.5×10.5×6.08mm) is slightly out of normal range for
4.27ct diamonds of this shape. Compared to 4.27
carat Radiant reference diamond, this diamond seems a bit too large
when viewed from the top. This could be indicative of a spread cut, which is not a good sign.
A spread cut is a diamond that is cut to maximize spread. In this case, it would look larger than a well cut 4.27 carat Radiant when viewed from the top, however, this is usually not a good thing. Spread cuts are typically too shallow, which allows light to leak out of the stone instead of being properly returned back to the viewer's eye.
Spread cuts can look lifeless and flat, and can sometimes exhibit a fish-eye effect. They may also come with an extremely thin girdle which can easily chip.
A spread cut is a diamond that is cut to maximize spread. In this case, it would look larger than a well cut 4.27 carat Radiant when viewed from the top, however, this is usually not a good thing. Spread cuts are typically too shallow, which allows light to leak out of the stone instead of being properly returned back to the viewer's eye.
Spread cuts can look lifeless and flat, and can sometimes exhibit a fish-eye effect. They may also come with an extremely thin girdle which can easily chip.
The bottom line:
This diamond could be a spread cut. Caution is advised, since spread cuts
usually lack the sparkle and perfection that is expected of a beautiful diamond.
4.27 carat Radiant reference diamond
Since there are no specific ideal proportions defined for Radiant cuts,
an estimation formula is used to calculate the Radiant reference diamond.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Note: Radiant diamonds with face-up area of within 9% lower
and 12% higher than reference Radiant diamond area
are considered to be of adequate face-up size.
* Estimated Face-up area: Face-up area of Radiant cuts
is only an estimation (±4%). Due to uniqueness of each stone,
it's impossible to accurately calculate face-up area given only a diamond's measurements.
To learn more about diamond size evaluation, click here.
Face-up Area per Carat
Face-up area per carat is calculated by dividing face-up area of the diamond with
its carat weight. It tells you how many square millimeters of the top surface area
a diamond is showing or would show for 1 carat weight. This can be useful when comparing stones
of similar weights as it tells you how much spread per carat you will get.
Note: Face-up size does not linearly grow with carat weight,
which means the heavier the stone, the smaller its face-up area per carat (e.g., 1ct stone will have
higher face-up area per carat than 2ct stone).
Face-up area per carat
for 8.32ct Emerald (11.8×13.7×7.67mm):
Top surface area = 153.58 mm²
Weight = 8.32ct
Face-up area per carat = 153.58 ÷ 8.32 = 18.46mm²/ct
Weight = 8.32ct
Face-up area per carat = 153.58 ÷ 8.32 = 18.46mm²/ct
Face-up area per carat
for 4.27ct Radiant (9.5×10.5×6.08mm):
Top surface area = 94.76 mm²
Weight = 4.27ct
Face-up area per carat = 94.76 ÷ 4.27 = 22.19mm²/ct
Weight = 4.27ct
Face-up area per carat = 94.76 ÷ 4.27 = 22.19mm²/ct
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a diamond, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a diamond, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.