9.3ct Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9) vs 9.3ct Round (13×13×7.9)

Diamond size comparison

Actual size is set for screen Change
Actual size of 9.3ct Cushion diamond
Actual size
sample image
vs.
Actual size of 9.3ct Round diamond
Actual size
sample image
9.3 ct Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm) 9.3 ct Round (13×13×7.9mm)
Cutting style
(modified) brilliant
Brilliant
Weight
9.3 ct
9.3 ct
Measurements
13.7×13.7×7.9 mm
13×13×7.9 mm
Total depth
57.7% too shallow!
60.8% OK
L/W ratio
1
1
Face-up size
Inadequate
Inadequate
 
This diamond is a SPREAD CUT!
This diamond does NOT look its weight!
Actual diamond size
Actual diamond size
Before purchasing a diamond, one should make sure it looks its weight. It's important to understand that carat weight does not equal face-up size.

Two diamonds of exactly the same weight (and shape) can vary quite considerably in face-up size. This depends on the proportions of the cut (e.g., deep cuts will face up smaller).

Here you can see the actual sizes of 9.3ct Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm) and 9.3ct Round (13×13×7.9mm) as they would appear on a ring and finger.

Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these stones would look on your finger. To choose different diamonds or to change diamond parameters click here.
Settings
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
Left finger image
Ring on a left finger
9.3ct Cushion on a left ring
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
9.3ct Round on a right ring
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
9.3ct Cushion side view Side view of ring
vs
9.3ct Round side view Side view of ring
Actual size is set for screen Change
Face-up area
168.92 mm²  (±5%)
132.73 mm² 
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the diamond when viewed from the top (as set in a ring).

It tells you how big the diamond is at the girdle plane. It's important for a diamond to have sufficient face-up size for its carat weight.
Face-up size outline
Face-up size outline
9.3ct Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm)
9.3ct Round (13×13×7.9mm)
Difference: 36.19mm² (27%)
9.3 carat Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm) has approx. 27% more face-up area than 9.3 carat Round (13×13×7.9mm).
Face-up area per carat
18.16 mm²/ct
14.27 mm²/ct
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.


Quick Buying Guide

Diamond prices vary greatly as they depend on the combination of unique characteristics (4Cs - Cut, Color, Clarity, and Carat). For best value, it's important to choose the combination that will reduce the price without having a negative impact on appearance.

Each shape has its own recommended balance of qualities that will give you the most bang for your buck. Below is a quick buying guide to give you an idea, but for more detailed explanation, please see the complete buying guides for the respective diamonds (links below).
9.3ct Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm)
9.3ct Round (13×13×7.9mm)
Price (best value)
Min. clarity
SI1 or better
SI or better
Min. color (platinum setting)
H+
J+
Min. color (yellow gold setting)
J+
K+
Depth percentage
59 - 70%
58 - 62.5%
Table percentage
56 - 70%
53 - 58%
Length-to-width ratio
1.00 - 1.35
1.00 - 1.02
Min. polish/symmetry
Good or better
Good or better
 Detailed buying guide

Additional Info

9.3ct Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm)
9.3ct Round (13×13×7.9mm)
Face-up size
Too large for 9.3 carat Cushion
Too small for 9.3 carat Round
Facets
usually 58
58 (57 if no culet)
Length
13.7 mm
13 mm
Width
13.7 mm
13 mm
Depth
7.9 mm
7.9 mm
Gram weight
1.86 g (0.0656 ounces)
1.86 g (0.0656 ounces)
Points
930 pts
930 pts
Volume
528.41 mm³
528.41 mm³


Compare diamonds

Choose diamonds to compare:
 
× ×
carat vs. length* width* depth*
× ×
 
* Optional

Depth percentage for 9.3 carat Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm)

Depth percentage of Cushion cut is the ratio of the total depth (measured from table to culet) to its width. The total depth percentage of this diamond is 57.7%, which is too shallow!. (Recommended depth percentage for Cushions is between 59% and 70%)

Depth percentage for cushions is calculated with the following formula:
Depth % = (total depth ÷ width) × 100

9.3 carat Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm) depth %:
Total depth: 7.9 mm
Width = 13.7 mm
Depth % = (7.9 ÷ 13.7 ) × 100 = 57.7%

Depth percentage for 9.3 carat Round (13×13×7.9mm)

Depth percentage of Round cut is the ratio of the total depth (measured from table to culet) to its average diameter. The total depth percentage of this diamond is 60.8%, which is OK. (Recommended depth percentage for Rounds is between 58% and 62.5%)

Depth percentage for rounds is calculated with the following formula:
Depth % = (total depth ÷ average diameter) × 100

9.3 carat Round (13×13×7.9mm) depth %:
Total depth: 7.9 mm
Average diameter = (13 + 13) ÷ 2 = 13 mm
Depth % = (7.9 ÷ 13 ) × 100 = 60.8%

About Depth Percentage
Depth percentage is one of the most important measurements as it plays a critical role in diamond's appearance. If a diamond is cut too deep or too shallow, light leaks out, making the stone less brilliant and fiery. Deep cuts also add hidden weight.

Diamonds that fall out of recommended depth range are generally less desirable and usually best to be avoided.


Face-up size evaluation for 9.3 carat Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm)

The face-up size of this 9.3 carat Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm) is out of normal range for 9.3ct diamonds of this shape. Compared to 9.3 carat Cushion reference diamond, this diamond appears too big when viewed from the top. You might think that's a good thing, however, it's not. This is a so called spread cut.

A spread cut is a diamond that is cut to maximize spread instead of optimal light performance. If compared from above, it would look larger than a well cut 9.3ct Cushion. This is not a good thing. Spread cuts are typically too shallow, which allows light to leak out of the stone resulting in less light being reflected back to the viewer's eye.

Spread cuts usually look lifeless and flat, and can sometimes exhibit a fish-eye effect. They may also come with an extremely thin girdle which can easily chip.

The bottom line: Spread cuts generally lack the brilliance and perfection that is expected of a beautiful diamond. Don't be fooled into thinking that you're getting a larger diamond for the money. This could be a rather flat, boring stone.

9.3 carat Cushion reference diamond
Since there are no specific ideal proportions defined for Cushion cuts, an estimation formula is used to calculate the Cushion reference diamond.
Parameters:
Weight: 9.3ct
Depth: 64%
L/W ratio: 1
 
Calculated values:
Length: 12.25 mm
Width: 12.25 mm
Depth: 7.84 mm
*Est. face-up area: 135.06 mm²
Note: Cushion diamonds with face-up area of within 9% lower and 12% higher than reference Cushion diamond area are considered to be of adequate face-up size.
* Estimated Face-up area: Face-up area of Cushion cuts is only an estimation (±5%). Due to uniqueness of each stone, it's impossible to accurately calculate face-up area given only a diamond's measurements.
To learn more about diamond size evaluation, click here.


Face-up size evaluation for 9.3 carat Round (13×13×7.9mm)

The face-up size of this 9.3 carat Round (13×13×7.9mm) is out of normal range for 9.3ct diamonds of this shape. A well cut 9.3ct Round should have an average diameter between 13.32 and 13.87 mm. Compared to 9.3 carat Round reference diamond, this diamond appears too small when viewed from the top, which makes it a chubby.

A chubby is a diamond with hidden extra weight that looks smaller than it should when viewed from the top. Hidden weight is typically a result of a poor cut usually linked to oversized girdle, deeper pavilion, and/or steeper crown.

In order to maximize profits, diamond cutters tend to retain as much weight from the rough as possible. This practice, however, can have detrimental effects on the stone's face-up size and its optical qualities. Poorly proportioned stones look duller and sparkle less than well cut stones. Chubby stones also look smaller.

The bottom line: One should never sacrifice beauty for weight. You probably don't want to pay for extra weight that doesn't add anything to the beauty. You want a stone that looks its weight. This one doesn't - sizewise, it looks like a well cut 8ct diamond.

9.3 carat Round reference diamond
9.3ct Round reference diamond is calculated from the following ideal proportions:
Proportions:
Table: 57%
Crown angle: 34°
Pavilion angle: 40.7°
Girdle: 2.8%
Star length: 50%
Lower half-length: 80%
Culet: None
 
Calculated values:
Depth: 60.3%
Crown height: 14.5%
Pavilion height: 43%
For 9.3 carat weight:
Diameter: 13.67 mm
Face-up area: 146.77 mm²
Note: Round diamonds with face-up area of within 5% lower and 3% higher than reference Round diamond area are considered to be of adequate face-up size.
To learn more about diamond size evaluation, click here.


Face-up Area per Carat

Face-up area per carat is calculated by dividing face-up area of the diamond with its carat weight. It tells you how many square millimeters of the top surface area a diamond is showing or would show for 1 carat weight. This can be useful when comparing stones of similar weights as it tells you how much spread per carat you will get.

Note: Face-up size does not linearly grow with carat weight, which means the heavier the stone, the smaller its face-up area per carat (e.g., 1ct stone will have higher face-up area per carat than 2ct stone).

Face-up area per carat for 9.3ct Cushion (13.7×13.7×7.9mm):
Top surface area = 168.92 mm²
Weight = 9.3ct

Face-up area per carat = 168.92 ÷ 9.3 = 18.16mm²/ct

Face-up area per carat for 9.3ct Round (13×13×7.9mm):
Top surface area = 132.73 mm²
Weight = 9.3ct

Face-up area per carat = 132.73 ÷ 9.3 = 14.27mm²/ct

Enter your screen size (diagonal)

My screen size is  inches



Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.

If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a diamond, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.