2.67ct Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11) vs 2.01ct Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79)
Diamond size comparison
Actual size is set for screen
Change
sample image
|
vs. |
sample image
|
|||||||||
| 2.67 ct Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11mm) | 2.01 ct Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79mm) |
Cutting style
Modified brilliant
Modified brilliant
Weight
2.67 ct
2.01 ct
Measurements
11.28×7.32×4.11 mm
9.95×7.03×4.79 mm
L/W ratio
1.54
1.42
Face-up size
Inadequate
Borderline
This diamond does NOT look its weight!
This diamond BARELY looks its weight!
Actual diamond size
Before purchasing a diamond, one should make sure it looks its weight.
It's important to understand that
carat weight does not equal face-up size.
Two diamonds of exactly the same weight (and shape) can vary quite considerably in face-up size. This depends on the proportions of the cut (e.g., deep cuts will face up smaller).
Here you can see the actual sizes of 2.67ct Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11mm) and 2.01ct Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79mm) as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these stones would look on your finger. To choose different diamonds or to change diamond parameters click here.
Two diamonds of exactly the same weight (and shape) can vary quite considerably in face-up size. This depends on the proportions of the cut (e.g., deep cuts will face up smaller).
Here you can see the actual sizes of 2.67ct Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11mm) and 2.01ct Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79mm) as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these stones would look on your finger. To choose different diamonds or to change diamond parameters click here.
Settings
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Saved...
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Actual size is set for screen
Change
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the diamond
when viewed from the top (as set in a ring).
It tells you how big the diamond is at the girdle plane. It's important for a diamond to have sufficient face-up size for its carat weight.
It tells you how big the diamond is at the girdle plane. It's important for a diamond to have sufficient face-up size for its carat weight.
| 2.67ct Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11mm) | |
| 2.01ct Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79mm) | |
| Difference: 9.22mm² (18%) |
2.67 carat Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11mm) has approx. 18% more face-up area than 2.01 carat Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79mm).
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here.
Quick Buying Guide
Diamond prices vary greatly as they depend on the combination of unique characteristics (4Cs - Cut, Color, Clarity, and Carat). For best value, it's important to choose the combination that will reduce the price without having a negative impact on appearance.
Each shape has its own recommended balance of qualities that will give you the most bang for your buck. Below is a quick buying guide to give you an idea, but for more detailed explanation, please see the complete buying guides for the respective diamonds (links below).
Each shape has its own recommended balance of qualities that will give you the most bang for your buck. Below is a quick buying guide to give you an idea, but for more detailed explanation, please see the complete buying guides for the respective diamonds (links below).
2.67ct Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11mm)
2.01ct Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79mm)
Min. clarity
SI or better
SI or better
Min. color (platinum setting)
H+
H+
Min. color (yellow gold setting)
J+
J+
Depth percentage
59 - 65%
59 - 65%
Table percentage
50 - 65%
50 - 65%
Length-to-width ratio
1.45 - 1.75
1.45 - 1.75
Min. polish/symmetry
Good or better
Good or better
Additional Info
2.67ct Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11mm)
2.01ct Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79mm)
Face-up size
Too small for 2.67 carat Pear
A bit small for 2.01 carat Pear
Facets
usually 58
usually 58
Length
11.28 mm
9.95 mm
Width
7.32 mm
7.03 mm
Depth
4.11 mm
4.79 mm
Gram weight
0.53 g (0.0188 ounces)
0.4 g (0.0142 ounces)
Points
267 pts
201 pts
Volume
151.7 mm³
114.2 mm³
Compare diamonds
Choose diamonds to compare:
Popular comparisons:
- 2.7ct Pear (12.6x7.59x4.63) vs. 3ct Pear (13.05x7.86x4.79)
- 2.59ct Pear (11.86x7.89x4.59) vs. 2.93ct Pear (12.55x8.25x4.84)
- 2.62ct Pear (11.43x8.01x4.89) vs. 2.02ct Pear (10.63x7.28x4.44)
- 2.62ct Pear (11.83x7.74x4.82) vs. 3.07ct Pear (12.35x8.12x5.16)
- 2.7ct Pear (12.6x7.59x4.63) vs. 2.7ct Oval (11.3x7.53x4.59)
- 2.75ct Pear (12.68x7.64x4.66) vs. 2.75ct Round (9.11x9.11x5.49)
- 2.73ct Pear (12.06x7.88x4.89) vs. 4.6ct Emerald (11.6x7.6x4.94)
- 2.75ct Pear (12.68x7.64x4.66) vs. 3ct Pear (13.05x7.86x4.79)
- 2.64ct Pear (12.14x8.24x4.49) vs. 3ct Pear (12.9x8.17x4.85)
Depth percentage for 2.67 carat Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11mm)
Depth percentage of Pear cut is the ratio of the total depth (measured from table to culet)
to its width. The total depth percentage of this diamond
is 56.1%, which is too shallow!.
(Recommended depth percentage for Pears is between 59% and
65%)
Depth percentage for pears is calculated with the following formula:
Depth percentage for pears is calculated with the following formula:
Depth % = (total depth ÷ width) × 100
2.67 carat
Pear
(11.28×7.32×4.11mm) depth %:
Total depth: 4.11 mm
Width = 7.32 mm
Width = 7.32 mm
Depth % = (4.11 ÷ 7.32 ) × 100 = 56.1%
Depth percentage for 2.01 carat Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79mm)
Depth percentage of Pear cut is the ratio of the total depth (measured from table to culet)
to its width. The total depth percentage of this diamond
is 68.1%, which is too deep!.
(Recommended depth percentage for Pears is between 59% and
65%)
Depth percentage for pears is calculated with the following formula:
Depth percentage for pears is calculated with the following formula:
Depth % = (total depth ÷ width) × 100
2.01 carat
Pear
(9.95×7.03×4.79mm) depth %:
Total depth: 4.79 mm
Width = 7.03 mm
Width = 7.03 mm
Depth % = (4.79 ÷ 7.03 ) × 100 = 68.1%
About Depth Percentage
Depth percentage is one of the most important measurements as it plays a critical role in diamond's
appearance. If a diamond is cut too deep or too shallow, light leaks out, making
the stone less brilliant and fiery. Deep cuts also add hidden weight.
Diamonds that fall out of recommended depth range are generally less desirable and usually best to be avoided.
Diamonds that fall out of recommended depth range are generally less desirable and usually best to be avoided.
Face-up size evaluation for 2.67 carat Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11mm)
The face-up size of this 2.67 carat Pear
(11.28×7.32×4.11mm) is out of normal range for
2.67ct diamonds of this shape. Compared to 2.67
carat Pear reference diamond,
this diamond appears too small when viewed from the top, which makes it a chubby.
A chubby is a diamond with hidden extra weight that looks smaller than it should when viewed from the top. Hidden weight is typically a result of a poor cut usually linked to oversized girdle, deeper pavilion, and/or steeper crown.
In order to maximize profits, diamond cutters tend to retain as much weight from the rough as possible. This practice, however, can have detrimental effects on the stone's face-up size and its optical qualities. Poorly proportioned stones look duller and sparkle less than well cut stones. Chubby stones also look smaller.
A chubby is a diamond with hidden extra weight that looks smaller than it should when viewed from the top. Hidden weight is typically a result of a poor cut usually linked to oversized girdle, deeper pavilion, and/or steeper crown.
In order to maximize profits, diamond cutters tend to retain as much weight from the rough as possible. This practice, however, can have detrimental effects on the stone's face-up size and its optical qualities. Poorly proportioned stones look duller and sparkle less than well cut stones. Chubby stones also look smaller.
The bottom line:
One should never sacrifice beauty for weight.
You probably don't want to pay for extra weight that doesn't add anything to the beauty.
You want a stone that looks its weight. This 2.67ct Pear doesn't - from above, its size is comparable to a well cut 2.19ct Pear.
2.67 carat Pear reference diamond
Since there are no specific ideal proportions defined for Pear cuts,
an estimation formula is used to calculate the Pear reference diamond.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Note: Pear diamonds with face-up area of within 9% lower
and 12% higher than reference Pear diamond area
are considered to be of adequate face-up size.
* Estimated Face-up area: Face-up area of Pear cuts
is only an estimation (±4%). Due to uniqueness of each stone,
it's impossible to accurately calculate face-up area given only a diamond's measurements.
To learn more about diamond size evaluation, click here.
Face-up size evaluation for 2.01 carat Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79mm)
The face-up size of this 2.01 carat Pear
(9.95×7.03×4.79mm) is slightly out of normal range for
2.01ct diamonds of this shape. Compared to 2.01
carat Pear reference diamond,
this diamond appears a bit too small when viewed from the top, which means it's
probably a borderline chubby.
A chubby is a diamond with hidden extra weight that looks smaller than it should when viewed from the top. Hidden weight is typically a result of a poor cut usually linked to oversized girdle, deeper pavilion, and/or steeper crown.
In order to maximize profits, diamond cutters tend to retain as much weight from the rough as possible. This practice, however, can have detrimental effects on the stone's face-up size and its optical qualities. Poorly proportioned stones look duller and sparkle less than well cut stones. Chubby stones also look smaller.
A chubby is a diamond with hidden extra weight that looks smaller than it should when viewed from the top. Hidden weight is typically a result of a poor cut usually linked to oversized girdle, deeper pavilion, and/or steeper crown.
In order to maximize profits, diamond cutters tend to retain as much weight from the rough as possible. This practice, however, can have detrimental effects on the stone's face-up size and its optical qualities. Poorly proportioned stones look duller and sparkle less than well cut stones. Chubby stones also look smaller.
The bottom line:
One should never sacrifice beauty for weight.
You probably don't want to pay for extra weight that doesn't add anything to the beauty.
You want a stone that looks its weight. Sizewise, this 2.01ct Pear looks like a well cut 1.68ct Pear.
2.01 carat Pear reference diamond
Since there are no specific ideal proportions defined for Pear cuts,
an estimation formula is used to calculate the Pear reference diamond.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Note: Pear diamonds with face-up area of within 9% lower
and 12% higher than reference Pear diamond area
are considered to be of adequate face-up size.
* Estimated Face-up area: Face-up area of Pear cuts
is only an estimation (±4%). Due to uniqueness of each stone,
it's impossible to accurately calculate face-up area given only a diamond's measurements.
To learn more about diamond size evaluation, click here.
Face-up Area per Carat
Face-up area per carat is calculated by dividing face-up area of the diamond with
its carat weight. It tells you how many square millimeters of the top surface area
a diamond is showing or would show for 1 carat weight. This can be useful when comparing stones
of similar weights as it tells you how much spread per carat you will get.
Note: Face-up size does not linearly grow with carat weight,
which means the heavier the stone, the smaller its face-up area per carat (e.g., 1ct stone will have
higher face-up area per carat than 2ct stone).
Face-up area per carat
for 2.67ct Pear (11.28×7.32×4.11mm):
Top surface area = 60.28 mm²
Weight = 2.67ct
Face-up area per carat = 60.28 ÷ 2.67 = 22.58mm²/ct
Weight = 2.67ct
Face-up area per carat = 60.28 ÷ 2.67 = 22.58mm²/ct
Face-up area per carat
for 2.01ct Pear (9.95×7.03×4.79mm):
Top surface area = 51.06 mm²
Weight = 2.01ct
Face-up area per carat = 51.06 ÷ 2.01 = 25.4mm²/ct
Weight = 2.01ct
Face-up area per carat = 51.06 ÷ 2.01 = 25.4mm²/ct
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a diamond, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a diamond, ring and finger will not be shown correctly.